Shaomin Sui v. FedEx Ground Package System, Incorporated

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 28, 2025
• Docket: 24-2101
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-2101 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/28/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-2101

SHAOMIN SUI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah Lynn Boardman, District Judge. (1:19-cv-03318-DLB)

Submitted: January 23, 2025 Decided: January 28, 2025

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaomin Sui, Appellant Pro Se. Brian James Kluckman, Moon Township, Pennsylvania, William George Whitman, IV, FEDEX GROUND, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-2101 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/28/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Shaomin Sui appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

reconsideration of its order denying his motion to reopen his case. We have reviewed the

record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Sui

failed to satisfy certain threshold criteria or to state any grounds for relief under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 60(b). See Justus v. Clarke, 78 F.4th 97, 105-06 (4th Cir. 2023) (discussing

standards for granting Rule 60(b) motion), cert. denied sub nom. Dotson v. Justus, 144 S.

Ct. 1096 (2024); Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (stating

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Sui v. FedEx

Ground Package Sys., Inc., No. 1:19-cv-03318-DLB (D. Md. Oct. 11, 2024). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED