Shao Yong Jiang v. Holder
This text of 478 F. App'x 20 (Shao Yong Jiang v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Shao Yong Jiang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2012). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Shao Yong Jiang (B.I.A. Feb. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 F. App'x 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shao-yong-jiang-v-holder-ca4-2012.