Shao Yong Jiang v. Gonzales
This text of 126 F. App'x 127 (Shao Yong Jiang v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Shao Yong Jiang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of a January 8, 2004 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004) (grant or denial of motion to reopen is within the discretion of the Board); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); Stewart v. INS, 181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir.1999). Therefore, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 F. App'x 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shao-yong-jiang-v-gonzales-ca4-2005.