Shanor Unemployment Compensation Case

146 A.2d 336, 188 Pa. Super. 301, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 600
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 9, 1958
DocketAppeal, No. 223
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 146 A.2d 336 (Shanor Unemployment Compensation Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shanor Unemployment Compensation Case, 146 A.2d 336, 188 Pa. Super. 301, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 600 (Pa. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the claimant, Frank Shanor, was held to be ineligible for unemployment benefits in that he had been discharged [302]*302by a prior employer for being repeatedly absent from work without notice, and where he had not earned eight times his weekly benefit rate in subsequent employment as provided by Section 401 (f) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of December 5, 1936, P. L. 2897 (1937), as amended, 43 PS §801 (f).

The bureau, the referee and the board all concluded that the claimant was ineligible and the only question before us on appeal is whether the findings so made are based on competent testimony. Ristis Unemployment Compensation Case, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 400, 116 A. 2d 271 (1955).

The record shows that during his employment by Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, California, Pennsylvania, he had a record of considerable absenteeism and had been warned that his next unreported absence would result in his discharge. He absented himself for seven consecutive days without notice to his employer, immediately prior to his discharge on January 11, 1957. This evidence amply supported the board’s finding.

We have held that under the “willful misconduct” Section 402 (e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802 (e), that a discharge of a claimant for excessive absenteeism without notice and after warning, that the separation from employment was the result of willful misconduct which disqualifies him for benefits. Curran Unemployment Compensation Case, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 578, 124 A. 2d 404 (1956).

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oritz v. Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board
305 A.2d 629 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1973)
Hohnstock Unemployment Compensation Case
175 A.2d 167 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Sullivan v. Employment Security Commission
100 N.W.2d 713 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1960)
Schwartz Unemployment Compensation Case
149 A.2d 182 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 A.2d 336, 188 Pa. Super. 301, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shanor-unemployment-compensation-case-pasuperct-1958.