Shannon v. United States

319 A.2d 135, 1974 D.C. App. LEXIS 422
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 1974·No. No. 7102·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing and the opposition thereto, it is this 15th‘day of March, 1974,

Ordered that the opinion and judgment entered on the 12th day of November 1973, 311 A.2d 501, are hereby modified by striking the last two paragraphs of the opinion and, in lieu thereof, inserting the following:

Because of the frequency and manner of the court’s intrusions into the interrogation of the witnesses — sometimes interrupting answers to material questions, we are unable to conduct a meaningful review of the record. Thus, we are left with the conviction that the trial did not meet the,minimum standards for the administration of criminal justice.4 We conclude, therefore, that the judgment of conviction should not be permitted to stand.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shannon v. United States, 319 A.2d 135, 1974 D.C. App. LEXIS 422 (D.C. 1974).

319 A.2d 135 (Shannon v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. United States
618 A.2d 191 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)