Shannon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shannon v. State

770 S.W.2d 372, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 455, 1989 WL 31323

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 4, 1989·No. No. 55180·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing wherein movant sought to vacate his conviction pursuant to a guilty plea of stealing, third offense, for which he was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing wherein movant sought to vacate his conviction pursuant to a guilty plea of stealing, third offense, for which he was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Shannon v. State, 770 S.W.2d 372, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 455, 1989 WL 31323 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

770 S.W.2d 372 (Shannon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.