Shannon v. Shannon
139 A. 173, 101 N.J. Eq. 816, 16 Stock. 816, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 623
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, . Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shannon v. Shannon, 139 A. 173, 101 N.J. Eq. 816, 16 Stock. 816, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 623 (N.J. 1927).
139 A. 173 (Shannon v. Shannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sadler v. Bergstrom
168 A. 50 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)