Shannon v. Shannon

2012 ND 222
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 23, 2012
Docket20110340
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2012 ND 222 (Shannon v. Shannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shannon v. Shannon, 2012 ND 222 (N.D. 2012).

Opinion

Filed 10/23/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 208

Randy Holkesvig, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Gary Grove, Defendant and Appellee

Nos. 20120169 & 20120225

Appeals from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Laurie A. Fontaine, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Randy Holkesvig (on brief), self-represented, P.O. Box 82, Fargo, N.D. 58107-

0082, plaintiff and appellant.

Daniel L. Gaustad (on brief), P.O. Box 5758, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-5758, for defendant and appellee.

Holkesvig v. Grove

[¶1] Randy Holkesvig appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his claims against Gary Grove and from orders denying his post-judgment motions and prohibiting him from filing any further motions or pleadings in this case.

[¶2] After pleading guilty to stalking, Holkesvig unsuccessfully sued the complaining witness, two prosecutors, and a deputy sheriff, alleging wrongdoing in the criminal investigation and prosecution.   See Holkesvig v. Welte , 2012 ND 142, 818 N.W.2d 760; Holkesvig v. Welte , 2012 ND 14, 809 N.W.2d 323; Holkesvig v. Moore , 2011 ND 199, 806 N.W.2d 438; Holkesvig v. Welte , 2011 ND 161, 801 N.W.2d 712.  In 2011, Holkesvig brought this action against Grove, a sergeant with the Grand Forks County Sheriff’s Department, alleging misconduct in the criminal investigation.  The district court granted summary judgment dismissing Holkesvig’s claims, concluded the claims were frivolous, and ordered Holkesvig to pay costs and attorney fees.  The court also denied numerous post-judgment motions filed by Holkesvig and entered an order prohibiting Holkesvig from filing any further motions or pleadings in the case in the district court.

[¶3] We affirm the judgment and orders under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and order Holkesvig to pay double costs and $1,000 in attorney fees for this appeal.

[¶4] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albrecht v. Albrecht
2014 ND 221 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2014)
Riemers v. Hill
2014 ND 80 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 ND 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shannon-v-shannon-nd-2012.