Shannon v. Shannon
This text of 16 Ind. 410 (Shannon v. Shannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit to foreclose a mortgage, against Shannon and Prickett, the mortgagor, and a grantee of the mortgagor. Shannon appeared by an attorney, to whom he sent his retainer by the hand of the plaintiff’s attorney. The attorney faithfully did his duty, and no collusion appears with the plaintiff’s attorney. Nothing appears authorizing a reversal, on this ground.
No motion for a new trial was made, or exception taken aspo the proceedings and judgment against Prickett.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ind. 410, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shannon-v-shannon-ind-1861.