Shannon v. Ogletree

80 So. 41, 202 Ala. 219, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 354
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 30, 1918
Docket2 Div. 651.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 80 So. 41 (Shannon v. Ogletree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shannon v. Ogletree, 80 So. 41, 202 Ala. 219, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 354 (Ala. 1918).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

On the original heaving in this cause, it was ruled that the bill for sale for division could be maintained by a reversioner against a life tenant who was also a cotenant in reversion.

This ruling was not in harmony with the case of Fies v. Rosser, 162 Ala. 504, 50 South. 287, 136 Am. St. Rep. 57, which has been followed in the later cases of Letcher v. Allen, 180 Ala. 254, 60 South. 828, and Jordan v. Walker, 77 South. 838. 1 The court prefers to adhere to the rule declared in those cases, and the result is that the rehearing must be granted, and the judgment of the court below must be reversed, and a judgment here rendered sustaining the demurrer to the hill for want of equity.

Rehearing granted.

All concur.
1

201 Ala. 248.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aniton v. Robinson
134 So. 2d 764 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1961)
Etheredge v. Etheredge
123 So. 48 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Chapman v. York
94 So. 90 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Powe v. Payne
94 So. 587 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 So. 41, 202 Ala. 219, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shannon-v-ogletree-ala-1918.