Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit & Commercial Risk Management

184 So. 3d 665, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2444, 2016 WL 683311
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 2016·No. No. 1D15-4253·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla.1981).

WOLF, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit & Commercial Risk Management, 184 So. 3d 665, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2444, 2016 WL 683311 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

184 So. 3d 665 (Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit & Commercial Risk Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marvin Castellanos v. Next Door Company
192 So. 3d 431 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)