Shannon v. Garraghty

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shannon v. Garraghty. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 F. App'x 104
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2002·No. 01-7862·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7862

KENNETH SHANNON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID GARRAGHTY, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-00-1323-AM)

Submitted: March 25, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Shannon, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Shannon appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Shannon v. Garraghty, No. CA-

1323-AM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 18, 2001; entered Sept. 19, 2001).

We deny Shannon’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shannon v. Garraghty, (4th Cir. 2002).

Shannon v. Garraghty (Shannon v. Garraghty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related