Shannon Slocum v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedSeptember 16, 2019
Docket8:19-cv-00620
StatusUnknown

This text of Shannon Slocum v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (Shannon Slocum v. JPMorgan Chase Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shannon Slocum v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, (C.D. Cal. 2019).

Opinion

Note changes made by the Court (¶¶ 12.3, 12.6). 1 THOMAS P. QUINN, JR. (State Bar No. 132268) NOKES & QUINN 2 410 BROADWAY, SUITE 200 3 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 4 Tel: (949) 376-3500 Fax: (949) 376-3070 5 Email: tquinn@nokesquinn.com 6 Attorneys for Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHANNON SLOCUM, ) Case No: 8:19-cv-00620-JVS-KES 10 ) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 ) vs. ) ORDER RE AMENDED 13 ) ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 14 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, et al., ) ORDER ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) ) 18 ) ) 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff 21 Shannon Slocum and Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, Trans Union, LLC, 22 23 Equifax Information Services, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 24 through their respective attorneys of record, to seek entry of an Order pursuant to 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) as follows: 26 27 28 1 WHEREAS, in the course of these proceedings documents and information 2 have been and may be sought, produced, or exhibited by and among the parties to 3 4 this action relating to trade secrets, confidential research, development, technology, 5 or other proprietary information belonging to Defendants, 6 WHEREAS, these documents and information consists of highly confidential 7 8 research, development, technology, policies, procedures and other proprietary 9 information regarding Defendants’ efforts to ensure maximum possible accuracy in 10 11 the reporting and the reinvestigation of disputed credit information, 12 WHEREAS, These proprietary procedures have been independently 13 developed by each Defendant over the course of many years, 14 15 WHEREAS, Defendants are business competitors and the unprotected 16 disclosure of such information will work a clearly defined and serious injury and 17 18 expose Defendants to a risk of losing competitive advantage in the marketplace, 19 WHEREAS, although Defendants are well aware of the important role they 20 21 play with respect to consumer credit, the unrestricted disclosure of the Defendants’ 22 proprietary procedures will not further the public interest, and, in fact, may harm 23 the public interest by exposing the inner workings of Defendants’ policies and 24 25 procedures regarding consumer credit information to potential fraudsters, identity 26 thieves, and computer hackers, 27 28 1 THEREFORE, good causes exists for protecting the confidentiality of the 2 aforesaid trade secrets, confidential research, development, technology, or other 3 4 proprietary information belonging to Defendants, and an Order of this Court 5 protecting such confidential information shall be and hereby is made by this Court 6 on the following terms: 7 8 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 9 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve 10 11 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 12 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 13 prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 14 15 stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. 16 2. DEFINITIONS 17 18 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 19 designation of information or items under this Order. 20 21 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 22 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things regarding Defendants 23 proprietary policies, procedures, technology, systems, and research that they have 24 25 independently developed and/or which could be exploited by criminals, fraudsters, 26 or computer hackers to perpetrate fraud or compromise the integrity of Defendants’ 27 28 1 credit reporting, and therefore which qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 2 Civil Procedure 26(c). 3 4 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House 5 Counsel (as well as their support staff). 6 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information 7 8 or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 9 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 10 11 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 12 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 13 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced 14 15 or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 16 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 17 18 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 19 an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 20 21 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. 22 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 23 counsel. 24 25 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, 26 or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 27 28 1 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 2 party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and 3 4 have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 5 which has appeared on behalf of that party. 6 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 7 8 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 9 support staffs). 10 11 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 12 Discovery Material in this action. 13 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 14 15 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 16 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 17 18 and their employees and subcontractors. 19 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 20 21 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 22 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.” 23 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 24 25 Material from a Producing Party. 26

27 28 1 3. SCOPE 2 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 3 4 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 5 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 6 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 7 8 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 9 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover any 10 11 information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 12 Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party 13 as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including 14 15 becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise. 16 4. DURATION 17 18 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 19 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 20 21 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be 22 deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with 23 or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and 24 25 exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 26 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time 27 28 pursuant to applicable law. 1 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 2 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n
504 F.3d 792 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Agricultural Insurance v. Potts
26 A. 27 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shannon Slocum v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shannon-slocum-v-jpmorgan-chase-bank-cacd-2019.