Shannon Lee Abeyta v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 2, 2018
Docket07-18-00014-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Shannon Lee Abeyta v. State (Shannon Lee Abeyta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shannon Lee Abeyta v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00014-CR

SHANNON LEE ABEYTA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 100th District Court Hall County, Texas Trial Court No. 3822, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding

August 2, 2018

ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant Shannon Lee Abeyta appeals the trial court’s judgment by which he was

adjudicated guilty of failure to comply with sex offender registration requirements and

sentenced to twenty years imprisonment. The appellate record was originally due May

17, 2018. The reporter’s record was filed by this deadline, but the clerk’s record was not.

On June 11, 2018, we granted the district clerk, Mr. Hans Skovlund, an extension to June

25th to file the clerk’s record. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed and Mr.

Skovlund has not provided the court with an explanation for his failure to file the record. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c); 37.3(a)(2). On remand, the trial court shall determine the following:

1. what tasks remain to complete the filing of the clerk’s record;

2. why Mr. Skovlund has not completed the necessary tasks;

3. what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks; and

4. whether Mr. Skovlund can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds reasonable.

The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by August 31, 2018.

Should further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested

before August 31, 2018.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shannon Lee Abeyta v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shannon-lee-abeyta-v-state-texapp-2018.