SHANNON JEANNETTE MCMASTERS vs STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 12, 2022
Docket22-1040
StatusPublished

This text of SHANNON JEANNETTE MCMASTERS vs STATE OF FLORIDA (SHANNON JEANNETTE MCMASTERS vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SHANNON JEANNETTE MCMASTERS vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SHANNON JEANNETTE MCMASTERS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1040 LT Case Nos. 2022-CF-000413 2022-CF-000350 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 12, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, R. Lee Smith, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences

imposed by the trial court in two cases below following Appellant’s

negotiated, nolo contendere plea. However, we remand with directions to

the trial court to enter an amended judgment in circuit court case number

2022-CF-000350 to include the offense statute numbers for counts two and

three. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.986(b) (providing that the forms related to

judgment and sentence should include the count, crime, offense statute

number(s), degree of crime, case number, and OBTS number); see also

Barnett v. State, 329 So. 3d 809, 811–12 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021) (affirming

convictions and sentences in Anders appeal but remanding for the entry of

a corrected judgment to include sufficient details regarding the counts,

crimes, statute numbers, and degree of the crimes).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of amended judgment consistent

with opinion.

LAMBERT, C.J., EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SHANNON JEANNETTE MCMASTERS vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shannon-jeannette-mcmasters-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.