Shannon Greene v. City of Virginia Beach

Fourth Circuit

Shannon Greene v. City of Virginia Beach

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 28, 2023

Docket22-1140

StatusUnpublished

This text of Shannon Greene v. City of Virginia Beach (Shannon Greene v. City of Virginia Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shannon Greene v. City of Virginia Beach, (4th Cir. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1140 Doc: 20 Filed: 12/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1140

SHANNON KEENAN GREENE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00150-RCY-DEM)

Submitted: December 14, 2023 Decided: December 28, 2023

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shannon Keenan Greene, Appellant Pro Se. James Arthur Cales, III, FURNISS, DAVIS, RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1140 Doc: 20 Filed: 12/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Shannon Keenan Greene filed three separate lawsuits arising from her former

employment with the City of Virginia Beach (“Defendant”). The district court issued an

order administratively closing two of her cases—including the instant case—and directed

Greene to file an amended complaint in the third action that included all of her claims

against Defendant. Greene seeks to appeal the administrative closure of the instant case.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen

v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Greene seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See

Campbell-McCormick, Inc. v. Oliver, 874 F.3d 390, 394-95 (4th Cir. 2017); Penn-Am. Ins.

Co. v. Mapp, 521 F.3d 290, 295-96 (4th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI