Shannon Bernard Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 16, 2020·No. 14-19-00229-CR·Published

Opinion

Order filed January 16, 2020

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00229-CR

SHANNON BERNARD JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 56th District Court Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-CR-3031

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion was granted and an order to that effect issued.

In response, we have received documentation that the record was sent to appellant but have not received the certification from the clerk of the court as to the date on which delivery of the record to appellant was made.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 56th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shannon Bernard Jackson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Shannon Bernard Jackson v. State (Shannon Bernard Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)