Shanks v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Shanks v. State

105 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 692

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 4, 1925

Docket4 Div. 31.

StatusPublished

This text of 105 So. 925 (Shanks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shanks v. State, 105 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This court is of the opinion that the conviction of Arthur Shanks, one of the appellants, was proper and without error. Tlie judgment of conviction as to Arthur Shanks is affirmed. We are of the opinion, also, that the conviction of appellant Bud Shanks was improper. The evidence in no manner connected him with the offense complained of in the indictment. Under the evidence he was entitled to the general affirmative charge, and for the error of the court in refusing to give said charge the judgment of conviction appealed from, so far as it relates to appellant Bud Shanks, is reversed. Affirmed as to Arthur Shanks. Reversed and remanded as to Bud Shanks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This court is of the opinion that the conviction of Arthur Shanks, one of the appellants, was proper and without error. Tlie judgment of conviction as to Arthur Shanks is affirmed. We are of the opinion, also, that the conviction of appellant Bud Shanks was improper. The evidence in no manner connected him with the offense complained of in the indictment. Under the evidence he was entitled to the general affirmative charge, and for the error of the court in refusing to give said charge the judgment of conviction appealed from, so far as it relates to appellant Bud Shanks, is reversed. Affirmed as to Arthur Shanks. Reversed and remanded as to Bud Shanks.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shanks-v-state-alactapp-1925.