Shanks v. Ross

159 S.E. 700, 173 Ga. 55, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 260
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1931·No. No. 8442·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Where botli parents of an infant child are deceased, the father having survived the mother and by will having provided that his mother should be testamentary guardian of the person of such child, and where in a contest between the paternal and the maternal grandmothers of the child it appears that both are fit and proper persons to have custody of the child, the testamentary guardian is entitled to the custody. This is true although the maternal grandmother has caused herself to be appointed by the ordinary as “temporary guardian” of the child.

2. As between the two grandmothers, there are no presumptions in favor of either.

3. It follows that the court erred in awarding the custody of the child to the petitioner.

Judgment reversed.

All live Justices concur. Branch & Howard and B. L. Tiller, for plaintiff in error. Julius A. McCurdy Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shanks v. Ross, 159 S.E. 700, 173 Ga. 55, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 260 (Ga. 1931).

159 S.E. 700 (Shanks v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muggenborg v. Kessler
1981 OK 66 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1981)
Beavers v. Williams
23 S.E.2d 171 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)