Shanks v. Eastman Kodak Co.

47 A.D.2d 999, 366 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9499

This text of 47 A.D.2d 999 (Shanks v. Eastman Kodak Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shanks v. Eastman Kodak Co., 47 A.D.2d 999, 366 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant Diener Knitting Mill’s motion for summary judgment of dismissal of the complaint as against it was properly denied because defendant was possessed of the facts involved, and plaintiff had not had opportunity to ascertain them by examination before trial. In view of the record, plaintiff should proceed promptly to complete its discovery procedures. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term in negligence action.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Simons, Mahoney, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.2d 999, 366 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shanks-v-eastman-kodak-co-nyappdiv-1975.