Shankman v. New York City Housing Authority
This text of 21 A.D.2d 968 (Shankman v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, entered on April 10, 1964, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, without costs, to deny application of infant claimant for leave to serve a late notice of claim, and the application is in all respects denied, without costs. Where, as here, the infant had counsel within the statutory 90-day period prescribed by subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for the filing of a notice of claim and the failure to timely file a notice appears to be due to the inadvertence of counsel, it is settled in this Department that such failure does not occur “by reason of” the disability of infancy so as to permit an extension of the statutory period. (Matter of Goglas v. New York City Housing Auth., 13 A D 2d 939, affd. 11 N Y 2d 680; Matter of Odom v. New York City Housing Auth., 17 A D 2d 770.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 A.D.2d 968, 252 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shankman-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1964.