Shankman v. New York City Housing Authority

21 A.D.2d 968, 252 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3199
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 17, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, entered on April 10, 1964, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, without costs, to deny application of infant claimant for leave to serve a late notice of claim, and the application is in all respects denied, without costs. Where, as here, the infant had counsel within the statutory 90-day period prescribed by subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for the filing of a notice of claim and the failure to timely file a notice appears to be due to the inadvertence of counsel, it is settled in this Department that such failure does not occur “by reason of” the disability of infancy so as to permit an extension of the statutory period. (Matter of Goglas v. New York City Housing Auth., 13 A D 2d 939, affd. 11 N Y 2d 680; Matter of Odom v. New York City Housing Auth., 17 A D 2d 770.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shankman v. New York City Housing Authority, 21 A.D.2d 968, 252 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

21 A.D.2d 968 (Shankman v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bullard v. City of New York
118 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)