Shankle v. Goord
This text of 45 A.D.3d 1084 (Shankle v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
[1085]*1085As a result of a physical altercation involving petitioner and two correction officers, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in violent conduct, assaulting staff and refusing a direct order. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. On administrative appeal, the determination was affirmed with a modified penalty of 15 months in the special housing unit and a corresponding loss of privileges, as well as a recommended loss of good time. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, the misbehavior report and testimony at the hearing, together with the related documentation and photographs, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 40 AD3d 1335, 1336 [2007]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims that the gaps in the hearing transcript preclude meaningful appellate review and the modified penalty was excessive, have been examined and found to be unavailing.
Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.D.3d 1084, 844 N.Y.S.2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shankle-v-goord-nyappdiv-2007.