Shank v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr.

145 So. 256, 107 Fla. 606
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 145 So. 256 (Shank v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shank v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr., 145 So. 256, 107 Fla. 606 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The State Bank of Orlando and Trust Company failed and was taken in charge by Appellee as Liquidator in August, 1929. Appellant had a balance of $12,046.67 in the savings department at the time said bank closed and filed her proof of claim with the liquidator as *607 the law directs without designating it as a common claim or a preferred claim. The liquidator classified it as a common claim. This suit was brought more than twelve months after the appointment of the liquidator to have it decreed to be a preferred claim and paid as such, a motion to dismiss the bill was granted and this appeal is from that decree.

The record and brief of counsel have been examined and the final decree below is affirmed on authority of Court-right vs. Tunnicliffe, 104 Fla. 720, 140 So. 777.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur. Terrell and Brown, J. J., dissent. Ellis, J., absent on account of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Reddish
151 So. 273 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Willmer v. Newsom, Liquidator
149 So. 3 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 So. 256, 107 Fla. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shank-v-tunnicliffe-as-liqdr-fla-1933.