Shank v. Missouri National Education Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shank v. Missouri National Education Ass'n

474 S.W.3d 605, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1192, 2015 WL 7251886

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 2015·No. WD 78526·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Dr. Mickie Shank and her husband, Michael Shank, appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Missouri National Education Association (MoNEA), on the Shanks’ claims of defamation (libel), tor-tious interference with business expectancy, and loss of consortium,. based upon a letter drafted by MoNEA and provided to the Mexico School District Board of Education. The circuit court granted Mo-[606] NEA’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the Shanks could not prove malice in the publication of the letter. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Dr. Mickie Shank and her husband, Michael Shank, appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Missouri National Education Association (MoNEA), on the Shanks’ claims of defamation (libel), tor-tious interference with business expectancy, and loss of consortium,. based upon a letter drafted by MoNEA and provided to the Mexico School District Board of Education. The circuit court granted Mo-[606] NEA’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the Shanks could not prove malice in the publication of the letter. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Shank v. Missouri National Education Ass'n, 474 S.W.3d 605, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1192, 2015 WL 7251886 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

474 S.W.3d 605 (Shank v. Missouri National Education Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.