Shane v. Humana, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Shane v. Humana, Inc.

228 F. App'x 927

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 13, 2007·No. Nos. 06-14222, 06-14497·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set out in the district court’s order granting summary judgment, which was filed on June 19, 2006, except that we do not reach the issue of whether the “plus factors” requirement from antitrust law is applicable in civil RICO cases. Even if that requirement is not applicable, the district court’s judgment is still due to be affirmed under the facts and circumstances of this case.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set out in the district court’s order granting summary judgment, which was filed on June 19, 2006, except that we do not reach the issue of whether the “plus factors” requirement from antitrust law is applicable in civil RICO cases. Even if that requirement is not applicable, the district court’s judgment is still due to be affirmed under the facts and circumstances of this case.

AFFIRMED.

Shane v. Humana, Inc., 228 F. App'x 927 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

228 F. App'x 927 (Shane v. Humana, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related