Shane v. Humana, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Shane v. Humana, Inc.

228 F. App'x 927

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 2007

DocketNos. 06-14222, 06-14497

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 228 F. App'x 927 (Shane v. Humana, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shane v. Humana, Inc., 228 F. App'x 927 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set out in the district court’s order granting summary judgment, which was filed on June 19, 2006, except that we do not reach the issue of whether the “plus factors” requirement from antitrust law is applicable in civil RICO cases. Even if that requirement is not applicable, the district court’s judgment is still due to be affirmed under the facts and circumstances of this case.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set out in the district court’s order granting summary judgment, which was filed on June 19, 2006, except that we do not reach the issue of whether the “plus factors” requirement from antitrust law is applicable in civil RICO cases. Even if that requirement is not applicable, the district court’s judgment is still due to be affirmed under the facts and circumstances of this case.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 F. App'x 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shane-v-humana-inc-ca11-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack