Shane Gordon and Jennifer Gordon v. Darwin Neal Trahern and Deborah Trahern

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 11, 2012·No. 02-12-00186-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00186-CV

SHANE GORDON AND JENNIFER APPELLANTS GORDON

V.

DARWIN NEAL TRAHERN AND APPELLEES DEBORAH TRAHERN

------------

FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On July 11, 2012, we notified appellants that the trial court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that

payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.

35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. unless appellants, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellants shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED: October 11, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shane Gordon and Jennifer Gordon v. Darwin Neal Trahern and Deborah Trahern, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Shane Gordon and Jennifer Gordon v. Darwin Neal Trahern and Deborah Trahern (Shane Gordon and Jennifer Gordon v. Darwin Neal Trahern and Deborah Trahern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.