Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State

257 So. 3d 647

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 30, 2018

DocketNo. 1D17-2215

StatusPublished

This text of 257 So. 3d 647 (Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State, 257 So. 3d 647 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*648Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., appeals from the order approving the provisional trauma center application of Orange Park Medical Center, Inc., asserting three issues: (a) that the need for the new trauma center may not be deferred until the final selection phase of the process; (b) that the Department of Health was operating pursuant to an unadopted rule; and (c) that the Department erred in allowing the new trauma center to begin its operations prior to the completion of Shands' administrative challenge. As to issue (a), we affirm based on State, Dep't of Health v. Bayfront HMA Med. Ctr., LLC , 236 So.3d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). As to issue (b), we affirm based on State, Dep't of Health v. Shands Jacksonville Medical Center , No. 1D17-1713, --- So.3d ----, 2018 WL 5915402 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 13, 2018). As to issue (c), we conclude that the matter is moot.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

Wetherell, Makar, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

*648Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc., appeals from the order approving the provisional trauma center application of Orange Park Medical Center, Inc., asserting three issues: (a) that the need for the new trauma center may not be deferred until the final selection phase of the process; (b) that the Department of Health was operating pursuant to an unadopted rule; and (c) that the Department erred in allowing the new trauma center to begin its operations prior to the completion of Shands' administrative challenge. As to issue (a), we affirm based on State, Dep't of Health v. Bayfront HMA Med. Ctr., LLC , 236 So.3d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). As to issue (b), we affirm based on State, Dep't of Health v. Shands Jacksonville Medical Center , No. 1D17-1713, --- So.3d ----, 2018 WL 5915402 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 13, 2018). As to issue (c), we conclude that the matter is moot.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

Wetherell, Makar, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 So. 3d 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shands-jacksonville-med-ctr-inc-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack