Shand v. Commissioner

1985 T.C. Memo. 276, 50 T.C.M. 96, 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 356
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJune 10, 1985
DocketDocket No. 10411-84.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1985 T.C. Memo. 276 (Shand v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shand v. Commissioner, 1985 T.C. Memo. 276, 50 T.C.M. 96, 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 356 (tax 1985).

Opinion

CHARLES T. SHAND, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Shand v. Commissioner
Docket No. 10411-84.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1985-276; 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 356; 50 T.C.M. (CCH) 96; T.C.M. (RIA) 85276;
June 10, 1985.
*357 Charles T. Shand, pro se.
Mae J. Lew, for the respondent.

GOFFE

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

GOFFE, Judge: The Commissioner determined deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income taxes for the taxable years 1979, 1980, and 1981 in the amounts of $5,127, $6,856, and $1,731, respectively. The Commissioner also determined that there are additions to tax for the taxable years 1979, 1980, and 1981 under sections 6651(a), 1 6653(a)(1), 6653(a)(2), and 6654 as follows:

Year6651(a)6653(a)(1)6653(a)(2)6654
1979$794$256$111
19801,459343356
19812248750% of interest54
due on $1,731

After a concession by respondent, the issues for decision are (1) whether petitioner received wages and interest in each of the taxable years at issue, (2) whether the documents filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center constituted returns, and (3) whether assessment and collection of the deficiencies and additions to tax herein are barred by the statute of limitations.

*358 FINDINGS OF FACT

Some of the facts have been stipulated. The stipulation of facts and accompanying exhibits are so found and incorporated herein by reference.

Charles T. Shand (petitioner) was a resident of Colchester, Vermont, at the time the petition in this case was filed. Petitioner filed documents purporting to be Federal income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service Center at Ogden, Utah, for the taxable years 1979, 1980, and 1981 on April 16, 1980, April 17, 1981, and April 14, 1982, respectively. Other than his name, address, signature, and date, the only responses provided on the documents were claims to the protection of the Fifth Amendment and claims that providing answers on the Form 1040 would incriminate him. 2

During the taxable years at issue, petitioner was employed by the Waldinger Corporation. He received compensation for services rendered in the amounts of $23,784, $18,285, and $12,592 for the taxable years 1979, 1980, and 1981, respectively. Petitioner also received interest*359 from the Sheet Metal Workers Associated Credit Union in the amounts of $11, $32, and $22 for the taxable years 1979, 1980, and 1981, respectively.

On March 12, 1984, the Commissioner timely issued a statutory notice of deficiency to petitioner for the taxable years 1979, 1980, and 1981. The Commissioner determined that petitioner did not report the compensation and interest received in each of the taxable years at issue and, therefore, determined deficiencies in the amounts of $5,127, $6,856, and $1,731 for the taxable years 1979, 1980, and 1981, respectively. The Commissioner also determined that petitioner is liable for additions to tax in the amounts set forth above for each of the taxable years at issue: under section 6651 for failure to file timely Federal income tax returns, under section 6653(a) for underpayment of income tax due to negligence or intentional disregard of rules and regulations, and under section 6654 for failure to pay estimated tax.

OPINION

The Commissioner's determination in his statutory notice of deficiency is presumptively correct, and petitioner bears the burden of disproving each individual adjustment. Welch v. Helvering,290 U.S. 111 (1933);*360 Rule 142(a). Petitioner attempts to rely on the Fifth Amendment for his failure to bear his burden of proof, based upon his claim that he might be subject to a criminal investigation by respondent, or be subject to investigation generally by unknown parties. The record contains no evidence of such an investigation and the Court is satisfied that petitioner does not have a reasonable basis to fear self-incrimination. The possible danger, if any, of self-incrimination is so remote and speculative that it cannot serve as the basis for a Fifth Amendment claim in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welch v. Helvering
290 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1933)
United States v. Jerome Daly
481 F.2d 28 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. David N. Moore
627 F.2d 830 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
Gatto v. Commissioner
20 T.C. 830 (U.S. Tax Court, 1953)
Knollwood Memorial Gardens v. Commissioner
46 T.C. 764 (U.S. Tax Court, 1966)
Bixby v. Commissioner
58 T.C. 757 (U.S. Tax Court, 1972)
Grosshandler v. Commissioner
75 T.C. 1 (U.S. Tax Court, 1980)
McCoy v. Commissioner
76 T.C. 1027 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
Reiff v. Commissioner
77 T.C. 1169 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
Abramo v. Commissioner
78 T.C. No. 11 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)
Habersham-Bey v. Commissioner
78 T.C. No. 22 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)
Jarvis v. Commissioner
78 T.C. No. 45 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)
Abrams v. Commissioner
82 T.C. No. 29 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1985 T.C. Memo. 276, 50 T.C.M. 96, 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shand-v-commissioner-tax-1985.