Shanberg v. Georgetowne Mansions, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shanberg v. Georgetowne Mansions, Inc.

48 A.D.2d 886, 372 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10142

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 886 (Shanberg v. Georgetowne Mansions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shanberg v. Georgetowne Mansions, Inc., 48 A.D.2d 886, 372 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In this trespass action to recover damages, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 23, 1973, which (1) conditionally granted a motion by defendants Edelman and Jacobs to preclude plaintiffs from giving certain evidence and (2) denied a cross motion by plaintiffs (a) to strike a certain denial from said defendants’ answer to the complaint and (b) to vacate said defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars. The appeal was taken on or about May 29, 1973, but was not perfected until March 13, 1975. Order modified by adding thereto a provision that service of a bill of particulars by plaintiffs pursuant to the above-mentioned demand shall be deemed proper and timely if made within 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In the interests of justice, the time within which plaintiffs may serve their bill of particulars should be extended as hereinabove provided. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this trespass action to recover damages, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 23, 1973, which (1) conditionally granted a motion by defendants Edelman and Jacobs to preclude plaintiffs from giving certain evidence and (2) denied a cross motion by plaintiffs (a) to strike a certain denial from said defendants’ answer to the complaint and (b) to vacate said defendants’ demand for a bill of particulars. The appeal was taken on or about May 29, 1973, but was not perfected until March 13, 1975. Order modified by adding thereto a provision that service of a bill of particulars by plaintiffs pursuant to the above-mentioned demand shall be deemed proper and timely if made within 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In the interests of justice, the time within which plaintiffs may serve their bill of particulars should be extended as hereinabove provided. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 886, 372 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shanberg-v-georgetowne-mansions-inc-nyappdiv-1975.