Shanan Guinn v. The Walt Disney Company

District Court, C.D. California·Decided March 17, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-07770·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-07770-DSF-PVC Document 33 Filed 03/17/23 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:219

Shanan Guinn, Case No. 2:22-CV-07770-DSF (PVCx) Plaintiff,

v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER The Walt Disney Company,

Defendant.

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth L EGAL_US_W # 115638731.1 Case 2:22-cv-07770-DSF-PVC Document 33 Filed 03/17/23 Page 2 of 15 Page ID #:220

1 in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to 2 file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 3 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 4 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 5 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 6 Good cause exists in this case to enter a pretrial protective order. This case 7 involves factual allegations concerning a reorganization in the Company, including 8 the elimination of the Corporate Affairs Organization as well as Plaintiff alleging 9 detrimental reliance in resigning her prior employment with a Non-Party to this matter. As a result, the Parties anticipate that discovery will involve confidential, private, competitively sensitive and/or trade secret information relating to the internal organization of the Company and Plaintiff’s prior employment, business planning, and strategic considerations regarding the Company’s affairs. Additionally, the Parties anticipate that discovery may implicate private and personal employee information, such as personnel and/or employment files, financial and compensation information, mitigation efforts, and the like, raising additional concerns regarding constitutional privacy rights. Grobee v. Corr. Corp. of Am., No. 13CV1060-GPC DHB, 2014 WL 229266, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2014)(“Because jurisdiction in this action is based upon diversity, state law governs Defendant’s privacy claims. . . .Under California law, personnel records of employees are protected by California’s constitutional right of privacy.”)(citing Cal. Const., art. I, § 1); see also In re Insurance Installment Fee Cases, 211 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1428 (2012) (discussing privacy of financial information). Disclosure of such information without proper confidentiality protections in place could injure the rights and interests of the individuals and entities implicated. 2. DEFINITIONS 2 L EGAL_US_W # 115638731.1 Case 2:22-cv-07770-DSF-PVC Document 33 Filed 03/17/23 Page 3 of 15 Page ID #:221

1 2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit. 2 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 3 designation of information or items under this Order. 4 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 5 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 6 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and information that (1) 7 constitutes a trade secret within the meaning of 18 U.S. Code § 1839 or California 8 Civil Code section 3426; (2) is confidential, business, proprietary, or compensation 9 information, contractual, or personnel information not generally available to the public; (3) contains personal information of any prospective, current, or former Company employee, including addresses, social security numbers, personnel records, payroll, compensation, or other benefits information, health, and medical and/or workers’ compensation information; and (4) Plaintiff’s mitigation efforts including prospective employers. 2.4 Counsel: All Counsel including Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their firm attorneys and staff). 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 3 L EGAL_US_W # 115638731.1 Case 2:22-cv-07770-DSF-PVC Document 33 Filed 03/17/23 Page 4 of 15 Page ID #:222

1 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 2 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 3 counsel. 4 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 5 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 6 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 7 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 8 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 9 which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 4 L EGAL_US_W # 115638731.1 Case 2:22-cv-07770-DSF-PVC Document 33 Filed 03/17/23 Page 5 of 15 Page ID #:223

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shanan Guinn v. The Walt Disney Company, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Shanan Guinn v. The Walt Disney Company (Shanan Guinn v. The Walt Disney Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. P.A.
211 Cal. App. 4th 23 (California Court of Appeal, 2012)