Shanahan v. Klyn

255 N.W. 733, 268 Mich. 120, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 759
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 2, 1934
DocketDocket No. 113, Calendar No. 37,247.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 N.W. 733 (Shanahan v. Klyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shanahan v. Klyn, 255 N.W. 733, 268 Mich. 120, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 759 (Mich. 1934).

Opinions

Fead, J.

Alimony is a matter of decree of court, not of contract. Eddy v. Eddy, 264 Mich. 328. A stipulation of parties does not modify a decree. The stipulation at bar was not incorporated into a modified decree by the court and, therefore, amounted to no more than an agreement, or a receipt or forgiveness of the alimony due in excess of $400. The $400 was owing, not as a debt by private agreement but by force of the decree, and remained enforceable under it by contempt proceedings.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

*121 North, Butzel, Bushnell, and Edward M. Sharpe, JJ., concurred with Fead, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waters v. Albanese
547 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 N.W. 733, 268 Mich. 120, 1934 Mich. LEXIS 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shanahan-v-klyn-mich-1934.