Shanahan v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
66 N.W. 1151, 64 Minn. 300, 1896 Minn. LEXIS 125
This text of 66 N.W. 1151 (Shanahan v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shanahan v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co., 66 N.W. 1151, 64 Minn. 300, 1896 Minn. LEXIS 125 (Mich. 1896).
Opinion
After a careful examination of all the evidénce in this case, we conclude that it comes within the rule laid down in. Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), which is followed.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wood v. Cullen
13 Minn. 394 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1868)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 N.W. 1151, 64 Minn. 300, 1896 Minn. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shanahan-v-chicago-st-paul-minneapolis-omaha-railway-co-minn-1896.