Shamrock Towing Co. v. Manufacturers' & Merchants' Lighterage Co.

262 F. 844, 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 667
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 262 F. 844 (Shamrock Towing Co. v. Manufacturers' & Merchants' Lighterage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shamrock Towing Co. v. Manufacturers' & Merchants' Lighterage Co., 262 F. 844, 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 667 (E.D.N.Y. 1918).

Opinion

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The purpose of choosing this district was to obtain security. While concurrent jurisdiction exists between the districts, this does not give the right to obtain security in the district where personal service could be had. The possibility of levying upon the vessel does not give the right so to do. Hence it is not abuse of process to go into an adjoining district any more than it would be to go to a more remote district.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D/SA/S FLINT v. Sabre Shipping Corporation
228 F. Supp. 384 (E.D. New York, 1964)
Cavanaugh v. Starbuck Towing Corp.
261 F. 656 (E.D. New York, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 F. 844, 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shamrock-towing-co-v-manufacturers-merchants-lighterage-co-nyed-1918.