Shamery Blair v. West Town Mall
This text of Shamery Blair v. West Town Mall (Shamery Blair v. West Town Mall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 13, 2003 Session
SHAMERY BLAIR, ET AL. v. WEST TOWN MALL
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 1-229-00 Dale C. Workman, Judge
FILED APRIL 4, 2003
No. E2002-02005-COA-R3-CV
HOUSTON M. GODDARD , P.J., concurring
I concur with the result reached in this case but, like Judge Susano, disagree as to the "method of operation" theory advanced by Judge Swiney.
Consequently, it appears that upon remand, in view of the concurring opinions of Judge Susano and myself, that theory should not be presented to the trier of the fact.
I also point out that if the evidence remains substantially the same as in the present record, West Town Mall might well be entitled to a directed verdict because of the shifting burden of proof, vis-a-vis, a motion for summary judgment and a motion for directed verdict.
________________________________________ HOUSTON M. GODDARD, PRESIDING JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shamery Blair v. West Town Mall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shamery-blair-v-west-town-mall-tennctapp-2003.