Shameka Yvette McClain v. State
This text of Shameka Yvette McClain v. State (Shameka Yvette McClain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 18, 2017
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00194-CR ——————————— SHAMEKA YVETTE MCCLAIN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 182nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1497354
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Shameka Yvette McClain, pleaded guilty to the reduced class A
misdemeanor offense of deadly conduct, with an agreed punishment
recommendation of ten days in county jail and a $700 fine.1 In exchange for
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.05(a), (e) (West 1994). appellant’s plea, the State had agreed to reduce the charge from the second-degree
felony offense of aggravated assault to class A misdemeanor deadly conduct.2 In
accordance with her plea bargain with the State, the trial court found appellant guilty
and assessed her punishment at ten days’ confinement in county jail and a $700 fine.3
The trial court certified that this was a plea-bargain case and that appellant had no
right of appeal, but appellant, through counsel, timely appealed. See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(a)(2), 26.2(a). We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were
raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s
permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 1977); TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the
defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP.
P. 25.2(d).
Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the clerk’s record and states
that this is a plea-bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
The record confirms that appellant pleaded guilty to the reduced class A
misdemeanor deadly conduct charge and, thus, supports the trial court’s
2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a)(2), (b) (West 2009). 3 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.21(3) (West 1994). 2 certification. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 615; Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813
(Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (noting that agreement to plead guilty in exchange for
State’s reduction of charge is plea bargain under Rule 25.2(a)(2)). Because appellant
has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d
675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Brown.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shameka Yvette McClain v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shameka-yvette-mcclain-v-state-texapp-2017.