Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shamburger v. Union Carbide Corp.

Shamburger v. Union Carbide Corp.

913 So. 2d 1219, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16560, 2005 WL 2654377
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 2005·No. No. 4D04-2770·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed Appellant’s action on grounds of forum non conveniens. We reverse, as the order is founded on an untimely motion. See Fox v. Union Carbide Corp., 910 So.2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). We remand for further proceedings.

STONE, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shamburger v. Union Carbide Corp., 913 So. 2d 1219, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16560, 2005 WL 2654377 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

913 So. 2d 1219 (Shamburger v. Union Carbide Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox v. Union Carbide Corp.
910 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)