Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shamburger v. Union Carbide Corp.

Shamburger v. Union Carbide Corp.

913 So. 2d 1219, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16560, 2005 WL 2654377
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 2005
DocketNo. 4D04-2770
StatusPublished

This text of 913 So. 2d 1219 (Shamburger v. Union Carbide Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shamburger v. Union Carbide Corp., 913 So. 2d 1219, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16560, 2005 WL 2654377 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed Appellant’s action on grounds of forum non conveniens. We reverse, as the order is founded on an untimely motion. See Fox v. Union Carbide Corp., 910 So.2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). We remand for further proceedings.

STONE, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fox v. Union Carbide Corp.
910 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
913 So. 2d 1219, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16560, 2005 WL 2654377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shamburger-v-union-carbide-corp-fladistctapp-2005.