Shamburger v. Kennedy

12 N.C. 9
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shamburger v. Kennedy. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 N.C. 1
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 1826·Published

Opinion

Hair, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The deed executed by M’Neil, the Sheriff, to the Plaintiff, being an official act, conveyed a good and valid title — (3 Murph. 507.) In the other view of the case taken by the Judge, supposing the Sheriff did not act officially, but as the agent of Hussey, I do not concur, unless M’JSTeil had been duly authorised, by a written Power of Attorney, to execute the deed for him. An authority by parol would not be sufficient, because titles to land must be evidenced by written conveyances. I think the non-suit ought not to be set aside.

Per curiam,

Judgment aeeirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shamburger v. Kennedy, 12 N.C. 9 (N.C. 1826).

12 N.C. 9 (Shamburger v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.