Shamburg v. Abbott

15 A. 576, 121 Pa. 443, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 678
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 1, 1888
DocketNo. 300
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 A. 576 (Shamburg v. Abbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shamburg v. Abbott, 15 A. 576, 121 Pa. 443, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 678 (Pa. 1888).

Opinion

Opinion,

Mr. Justice Paxson :

A careful examination of this record fails to disclose any substantial error. It seems reasonably certain that all of the defendants, with the single exception of W. W. Thompson, were entitled to a verdict in their favor, by reason of either releases from the plaintiff or by their discharge in bankruptcy. And even as to Thompson, the jury have found in his favor upon sufficient evidence, and, for anything that appears, under proper instructions from the court. The plaintiff claims to have paid certain liabilities for Thompson, for which he, plaintiff, was surety. We are not furnished with the pleadings in the case, and can therefore only judge of the issue in a general way. Under such circumstances we will not discuss the rulings of the court upon this branch of the case. As far as we can judge from the. imperfect character of the record we see no cause for reversal; the judgment, therefore, is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Locasio v. Manale
4 Pelt. 330 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A. 576, 121 Pa. 443, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shamburg-v-abbott-pa-1888.