Shambow v. New Bedford Shuttle Co.

First Circuit

Shambow v. New Bedford Shuttle Co.

241 F. 115, 154 C.C.A. 115, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1742

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 1917

DocketNo. 1223

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 241 F. 115 (Shambow v. New Bedford Shuttle Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shambow v. New Bedford Shuttle Co., 241 F. 115, 154 C.C.A. 115, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1742 (1st Cir. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the decree of the District Court dismissing a bill brought for infringement of letters patent to Pierre P. Daudelin, No. 737,714, September 1, 1903, for shuttle and shuttle-eye

[119]*119We deem it unnecessary to repeat matter already dealt with to our satisfaction in the opinion of the District Court. We find in that opinion no error which was prejudicial to the appellant. There is force in the appellee’s contention that, in view of Figs. 3 and 5 of the patent to J. R. Northrop, No. 568,207, the District Court was too liberal to the plaintiff in allowing to the patent in suit novelty in the location of a slot at the bottom or underside of the thread-delivery eye.

But this does not require discussion; for, conceding this point to the appellant for the purpose of this appeal, we are satisfied with the reasoning aud conclusion of the District Court.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed, and the appellee recovers its costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI