Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Fourth Circuit

Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

567 F. App'x 183

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2014·No. No. 13-2514·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith B. Shamberger appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pro se complaint against Defendants after a review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:13-cv-00645-JAG, 2013 WL 6019248 (E.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith B. Shamberger appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pro se complaint against Defendants after a review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:13-cv-00645-JAG, 2013 WL 6019248 (E.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 567 F. App'x 183 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

567 F. App'x 183 (Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related