Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
This text of 567 F. App'x 183 (Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Keith B. Shamberger appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pro se complaint against Defendants after a review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:13-cv-00645-JAG, 2013 WL 6019248 (E.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
567 F. App'x 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shamberger-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-ca4-2014.