Shamas v. Ritter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shamas v. Ritter

432 So. 2d 128, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27719

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 3, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1266

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 432 So. 2d 128 (Shamas v. Ritter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shamas v. Ritter, 432 So. 2d 128, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27719 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s findings that appellee overcame the presumption of undue influence by coming forward with a reasonable explanation for her active role in the testatrix’s affairs, especially in the preparation of a new will, is supported by competent and substantial evidence and thus, will not be disturbed. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); In re Estate of Blakey, 363 So.2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s findings that appellee overcame the presumption of undue influence by coming forward with a reasonable explanation for her active role in the testatrix’s affairs, especially in the preparation of a new will, is supported by competent and substantial evidence and thus, will not be disturbed. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); In re Estate of Blakey, 363 So.2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

432 So. 2d 128, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shamas-v-ritter-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack