Shamas v. Ritter
432 So. 2d 128, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27719
Opinion
The trial court’s findings that appellee overcame the presumption of undue influence by coming forward with a reasonable explanation for her active role in the testatrix’s affairs, especially in the preparation of a new will, is supported by competent and substantial evidence and thus, will not be disturbed. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); In re Estate of Blakey, 363 So.2d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shamas v. Ritter, 432 So. 2d 128, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27719 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
432 So. 2d 128 (Shamas v. Ritter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ritter v. Shamas
452 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)