Shamas v. Bundy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shamas v. Bundy

401 So. 2d 1161, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20802

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 4, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1847

StatusPublished

This text of 401 So. 2d 1161 (Shamas v. Bundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shamas v. Bundy, 401 So. 2d 1161, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20802 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the trial court’s ruling granting a motion for involuntary dismissal at the conclusion of the opponents’ case on the ground that they had failed to make a prima facie showing that the challenged will had been procured by undue influence. See, Heasley v. Evans, 104 So.2d 854, 857 (Fla.2d DCA 1958); see generally, In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the trial court’s ruling granting a motion for involuntary dismissal at the conclusion of the opponents’ case on the ground that they had failed to make a prima facie showing that the challenged will had been procured by undue influence. See, Heasley v. Evans, 104 So.2d 854, 857 (Fla.2d DCA 1958); see generally, In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

401 So. 2d 1161, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shamas-v-bundy-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack