Shamas v. Bundy
401 So. 2d 1161, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20802
Opinion
We agree with the trial court’s ruling granting a motion for involuntary dismissal at the conclusion of the opponents’ case on the ground that they had failed to make a prima facie showing that the challenged will had been procured by undue influence. See, Heasley v. Evans, 104 So.2d 854, 857 (Fla.2d DCA 1958); see generally, In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shamas v. Bundy, 401 So. 2d 1161, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20802 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
401 So. 2d 1161 (Shamas v. Bundy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heasley v. Evans
104 So. 2d 854 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
In Re Estate of Carpenter
253 So. 2d 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)