Shalom Manor, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shalom Manor, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

497 So. 2d 740, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2415, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10703

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 1986

DocketNo. 4-86-1060

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 497 So. 2d 740 (Shalom Manor, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shalom Manor, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 497 So. 2d 740, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2415, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10703 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are satisfied from the record that HRS Form 1806 incorporates all of the elements required by statute and by Rule 10A-5.27(l)(c) for written notice of deficiencies. We also conclude that service of Form 1806 upon the administrator of the two adult congregate living facilities sufficed as proper notice to the licensee of the HRS violations. Therefore we affirm the final agency order. We note that this dispute could have been avoided by the agency sending notice to the licensee’s address [741]*741as well as to the administrator of the facility.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are satisfied from the record that HRS Form 1806 incorporates all of the elements required by statute and by Rule 10A-5.27(l)(c) for written notice of deficiencies. We also conclude that service of Form 1806 upon the administrator of the two adult congregate living facilities sufficed as proper notice to the licensee of the HRS violations. Therefore we affirm the final agency order. We note that this dispute could have been avoided by the agency sending notice to the licensee’s address [741]*741as well as to the administrator of the facility.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 So. 2d 740, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2415, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shalom-manor-inc-v-department-of-health-rehabilitative-services-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack