Shalom Manor, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

497 So. 2d 740, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2415, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10703
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 1986·No. No. 4-86-1060·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are satisfied from the record that HRS Form 1806 incorporates all of the elements required by statute and by Rule 10A-5.27(l)(c) for written notice of deficiencies. We also conclude that service of Form 1806 upon the administrator of the two adult congregate living facilities sufficed as proper notice to the licensee of the HRS violations. Therefore we affirm the final agency order. We note that this dispute could have been avoided by the agency sending notice to the licensee’s address [741] as well as to the administrator of the facility.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shalom Manor, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 497 So. 2d 740, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2415, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10703 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

497 So. 2d 740 (Shalom Manor, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mathis v. Florida Department of Corrections
726 So. 2d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Mathis v. Florida Dept. of Corrections
726 So. 2d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Oyster Pointe Resort Condo. v. Nolte
524 So. 2d 415 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)