Shalom House, Inc. v. Johnson

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedOctober 22, 2020
DocketCUMap-20-23
StatusUnpublished

This text of Shalom House, Inc. v. Johnson (Shalom House, Inc. v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shalom House, Inc. v. Johnson, (Me. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss. CIVIL ACTION DOCKETNO. AP- 20 - 23,',

SHALOM HOUSE INC., et. al.

v. ORDER

KENNETH JOHNSON, .. _,.,, -·. ­ r•\ :=D<,;a.::_· -- ,

et. al.

Before the Court is Defendant and Appellant Kenneth Johnson's Notice of Appeal

dated October 7, 2020. Johnson appeals a Judgment entered on August 31, 2020 (Darvin,

J.) in the District Court on Plaintiff's Complaint for Forcible Entry and Detainer. The

Judgment was entered after agreement and allowed Plaintiff possession of the property.

Pursuant to the agreement, the writ of possession was to issue after 30 days.

On September 25, the Defendant filed a request to vacate the judgment that the

District Court treated as a motion for relief of judgment pursuant to Rule 60. On October

5, the District Court denied the motion and ordered that the writ of possession could

issue, the 30 days having expired.

The Writ issued that day and was served on Defendant on October 8.. Meanwhile,

on October 7and 13, the Defendant made two additional filings. The Oct 7 filing can be

read as a Notice of Appeal. On October 19, the District Court noted that they could also

both be read as motions for relief of judgment and a motion to quash the writ of

possession and denied them both. To the extent the October 13 filing constituted a motion

to stay, it was also denied.

The right to appeal is defined by statute.

1 Either party may appeal on questions of law from a judgment to the Superior Court as in other civil actions. Either party may appeal on any issue triable by right by a jury to a trial de nova in the Superior Court as provided in this section. The time for filing an appeal of the judgment of the District Court expires upon the issuance of the writ of possession pursuant to section 6005 or 30 days from the time the judgment is entered, whichever occurs first.

14 M.R.S. § 6008(1) (emphasis supplied). Post judgment motions, such as a motion for

relief do not extend or suspend the running of the appeal period. Bangor Housing

Authority v. Mayheux, 2000 ME 60, '[ 5. The time limits for appeal to the Superior Court

are jurisdictional and the Superior Court must dismiss an action when the court is

without jurisdiction. Brown v. State, 426 A.2d 880,888 (Me. 1981).

Here, by the time the Notice of Appeal was filed on October 7, both the time limits

had expired, the 30 days expired on September 30 and the writ had issued on October 5.

The court DISlvIISSES Johnson's appeal.

This Order is incorporated on the docket by reference pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 79(a).

DATE: Oc), i7z WW LL rt---ifH' I0 Thomas R. McKean Justice, Maine Superior Court

Entered on the Docket ID /11.,/ '2±1

Plaintiffs Counsel-Wendy Paradis Esq Defendant-Kenneth Johnson-SRL' ·

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State, Department of Manpower Affairs
426 A.2d 880 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)
HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF BANGOR v. Maheux
2000 ME 60 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shalom House, Inc. v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shalom-house-inc-v-johnson-mesuperct-2020.