Shallcross v. Kretschmer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Shallcross v. Kretschmer

1 Colo. 493

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedFebruary 15, 1872

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Colo. 493 (Shallcross v. Kretschmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shallcross v. Kretschmer, 1 Colo. 493 (Colo. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cubiam.

A brief filed on behalf of plaintiff in error contains the statement that a promissory note was improperly received in evidence in the court below ; but the [494]*494note is not preserved in the record, and we cannot act upon the statement of counsel, unsupported by the record. The writ of error appears to have been prosecuted for delay, and we, therefore, affirm the judgment of the court below, with costs, and assess twenty per cent of the judgment below against the plaintiff in error as damages.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cubiam.

A brief filed on behalf of plaintiff in error contains the statement that a promissory note was improperly received in evidence in the court below ; but the [494]*494note is not preserved in the record, and we cannot act upon the statement of counsel, unsupported by the record. The writ of error appears to have been prosecuted for delay, and we, therefore, affirm the judgment of the court below, with costs, and assess twenty per cent of the judgment below against the plaintiff in error as damages.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Colo. 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shallcross-v-kretschmer-colo-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack