Shallcross v. City of Jeffersonville

26 Ind. 193
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1866·Published

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The appellants were prosecuted in the may- or’s court of the city of Jeffersonville for keeping a ferry and ferry boat on the Ohio river, and ferrying persons across said river for pay, from a point within the corporate limits of the city, without having first procured a license therefor from the common council of said city

Judgment was rendered against the appellants, and they appealed to the Circuit Court. In the latter court, judg[194] ment was again rendered against them, for $20 and costs, to which they excepted, and appeal to this court.

It. Crawford, for appellant. T. L. Smith, M. C. Kerr and C. L. Dunham, for appellee.

The case comes directly within the decision of this court in the. case of Duckwall et al. v. The City of New Albany, 25 Ind. 283, in which it was held that the act for the incorporation of cities did not authorize them to require the owners and keepers of ferries within the city limits to procure a license from the city authorities. The judgment must therefore be reversed.

The judgment is reversed,, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shallcross v. City of Jeffersonville, 26 Ind. 193 (Ind. 1866).

26 Ind. 193 (Shallcross v. City of Jeffersonville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duckwall v. City of New Albany
25 Ind. 283 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1865)