Shaland v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 344
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 3, 1957
DocketNo. 60988; protests 310156-K and 310277-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 344 (Shaland v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaland v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 344 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” and “B” consist of dime savings banks similar in all material respects to those the subject of M. Pressner & Co. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 12 percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the Torquay [345]*345Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), for articles, not specially provided for, wholly or in chief value of tin or tin plate, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 22)4 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, for manufactures of metal, not specially provided for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M. Pressner & Co. v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 262 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaland-v-united-states-cusc-1957.