Shal v. Mills
This text of 645 So. 2d 1079 (Shal v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the finding that an easement has been abandoned. See Dean v. Mod Properties, Ltd., 528 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Joseph v. Duran, 436 So.2d 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Dan Dee Corp. v. Samuels, 124 So.2d 733 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1960); Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co. v. City of Miami, 104 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); Powers v. Scobie, 60 So.2d 738 (Fla.1952). See and compare Southeast Seminole Civic Assoc. v. Adkins, 604 So.2d 523 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied 613 So.2d 9 (Fla.1992).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
645 So. 2d 1079, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11359, 1994 WL 656712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shal-v-mills-fladistctapp-1994.