Shal v. Mills
645 So. 2d 1079, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11359, 1994 WL 656712
Opinion
We affirm the finding that an easement has been abandoned. See Dean v. Mod Properties, Ltd., 528 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Joseph v. Duran, 436 So.2d 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Dan Dee Corp. v. Samuels, 124 So.2d 733 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1960); Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co. v. City of Miami, 104 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); Powers v. Scobie, 60 So.2d 738 (Fla.1952). See and compare Southeast Seminole Civic Assoc. v. Adkins, 604 So.2d 523 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied 613 So.2d 9 (Fla.1992).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shal v. Mills, 645 So. 2d 1079, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11359, 1994 WL 656712 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
645 So. 2d 1079 (Shal v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SE SEMINOLE CIVIC ASS'N v. Adkins
604 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Dean v. MOD Properties, Ltd.
528 So. 2d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Powers v. Scobie
60 So. 2d 738 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co. v. City of Miami
104 So. 2d 851 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Dan Dee Corp. v. Samuels
124 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Joseph v. Duran
436 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)