Shakur v. Stewart
59 F. App'x 944
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2003·No. No. 02-17097; D.C. No. CV-01-02470-PGR·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Arizona state prisoner Amin Rahman Shakur appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion to recuse the district court judge from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violation of the First Amendment. We lack jurisdiction over this interlocutory order. See Arizona v. Ideal Basic Indust. (In re Cement Antitrust Litigation), 673 F.2d 1020, 1022-25 (9th Cir.1982).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shakur v. Stewart, 59 F. App'x 944 (9th Cir. 2003).
59 F. App'x 944 (Shakur v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement Company
673 F.2d 1020 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)