Shakur v. Stewart
This text of 59 F. App'x 944 (Shakur v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Arizona state prisoner Amin Rahman Shakur appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion to recuse the district court judge from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violation of the First Amendment. We lack jurisdiction over this interlocutory order. See Arizona v. Ideal Basic Indust. (In re Cement Antitrust Litigation), 673 F.2d 1020, 1022-25 (9th Cir.1982).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F. App'x 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shakur-v-stewart-ca9-2003.