Shain v. State
872 S.W.2d 573, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 263, 1994 WL 41376
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shain v. State, 872 S.W.2d 573, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 263, 1994 WL 41376 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
872 S.W.2d 573 (Shain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.